.

Village Attorney: Ice Cream Sculpture Case Still Pending; Withdrawal was Procedural

Shock Owner Elyse Richman says the village is wasting time and money.

Westhampton Beach owner Elyse Richman was on the road to celebration when she learned from her attorney that a two-year-old village case against her had been withdrawn. Then, she learned that the attorney handing the case for the village said the withdrawal was procedural and that the case is still pending. 

According to Hermon Bishop, the village's outside attorney contracted to handle the case, in May, the village had actually filed two appeals with the State Appellate Court. Only one of them has been withdrawn. 

"The appeal is still pending," he said. "We withdrew one of them because it was an appeal from a decision and you can't appeal from a decision. It has to be from an order.

"The appeal from an order is the one that is still pending," said Bishop. 

The case involves a six-foot ice cream sculpture, which Richman had put up in front of her store and has since been stolen. The village slapped her with a $750 sign code violation and a lawsuit ensued with Richman claiming that the sculpture is not a sign, it was a decoration for a children's birthday party. 

Then, in April, Judge  J. Lee Snead tossed out the violation.

At the time, Mayor Conrad Teller said, "The judge dismissed the case because he said it was costing the village too much money. We are appealing that the case be tried."

The board unanimously hired Bishop at a rate of $190 an hour to appeal.

The latest development has left Richman baffled: "Bishop should have known you can't do an appeal on a decision. So basically he got paid for that and had to redo it."

Richman continued, "Why are they wasting my taxpayer money on this nonsense? They should be using this money to fix the sidewalk."

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Jaguar-Guy August 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM
What a COMPLETE waste of taxpayer money on a INCOMPETENT ATTORNEY.
MLT August 29, 2012 at 12:58 PM
worse hampton doing their worse, What next the duck at jonesys ??
George Smith August 29, 2012 at 01:10 PM
I totally agree with Ellyse & Jaguar Guy. This is an outrageous waste of taxpayers funds paying $190/hr. for incompetence. The village should replace the Mayor's cousin, "Special Counsel Bishop", immediately and refuse to pay fees for the wrong filing. Didn't the Trustees already replace him as Special Prosecutor?? Why don't they transfer the case to the new attorney right now before wasting any more money?? In fact, it would be better if they pulled the plug on the appeal right now. The whole thing is motivated by the vindictive Building Inspector. In this economic climate the Village cannot afford to waste funds and resources on this stupid issue. If Ellyse violates the ordinance in the future, pursue that. Stop turning the Village into a petty dictatorship
Elyse Richman December 21, 2012 at 01:19 AM
UPDATE :: and the clock continues to tick on this case at 190.00 the village has paid over 8000.00 to date, yes that is correct so far, over 42 hours of work on an appeal for an ice cream cone . Why ?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »