Parking Ban on Noyac Bay Avenue to Remain

Southampton Town Board votes 3-2 against lifting all parking restrictions.

A divided Southampton Town Board voted down a measure Tuesday, 3-2, that would have lifted in Noyac.

Current code allows parking in the area up to 100 feet from the water, which was established as a compromise; previously no parking was allowed anywhere. Parking is banned on the rest of the road from May 15 to Sept. 15 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.

For the Republican-Conservative bloc, who all voted to maintain the limited ban, the compromise was working well — there aren’t that many people parking anyway and it’s only for four months. And before voting they all firmly stated their support for beach access.

Councilwoman Nancy Graboski, R-Bridgehampton, stated her reasons for voting against lifting the restrictions by referring to six photos she had taken at the road ending that showed one car parked there and one woman sunning herself on the beach, which borders a channel, connecting Noyac Bay and Mill Creek.

“There is full beach access [with the compromise],” she said. “The restrictions are seasonal … and the objective of opening up the beach was accomplished.”

Her sentiments were echoed by Councilmen Jim Malone, C-Hampton Bays, and Chris Nuzzi, R-Speonk.

Malone said the compromise allowed seniors to watch the sunset from the beach, which constituents asked him to accomplish. But he added, "Lifting restrictions invited the possibility of disaster."

Nuzzi said the current situation allows for "commonsense restrictions on parking completely unrelated to beach access."

Supervisor Anna Throne-Holst, I-Sag Harbor, supported lifting the ban altogether “to protect a fundamental right” to beach access.

“Sure six cars can park now, but if another one comes, access is denied,” she said, adding this is precedent setting. “We are going to hear from residents of every road ending who want the same thing.”

Councilwoman Bridget Fleming, D-Noyac, also stated that beach access is a fundamental right.

Preceding the vote residents on both side of the issue addressed the board — within their three allocated minutes — in a manner that has characterized the debate since the introduction of the code change by Throne-Holst and Fleming in June with personal attacks, and accusations of elitism.

Hungry Naturalist August 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM
Geography check: "the entrance to Mecox Bay." or perhaps....Noyack Bay.
highhatsize August 11, 2011 at 02:37 PM
Disgraceful, but not unexpected. Where a privileged class and the commonweal collide, the Republicans/Conservatives will always support privilege. I particularly liked Grabowski's argument, i.e. "They're not using the parking [when I was there], so they don't need it." Whether they need it or not, Nancy, they have a RIGHT to it. It BELONGS to the residents, not to you.
David D'Agostino August 11, 2011 at 04:46 PM
Well said, highhatsize. The three republican board members have really shown their cards with this one. The beaches belong to the people and any attempt at restricting access is unacceptable.
Jerry Can August 11, 2011 at 10:29 PM
Bad vote for the residents of Southampton town. I guess we know which way the money flows in that area...This decision can be overturned after the next election when the balance shifts to the left.
Brendan J. O'Reilly August 12, 2011 at 01:07 AM
Thanks for pointing that out. I have made the correction.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »